THE CONSERVATIONIST WHO CONTROLS THE LAND: HOW LOUIS BACON’S GREEN EMPIRE IS BUILT ON POWER, WEALTH, AND SILENCE

For a man who’s spent decades cultivating a reputation as one of America’s leading conservationists, Louis Bacon sure knows how to wield power like a developer with a wrecking ball. His name carries weight in environmental circles — a billionaire hedge fund tycoon turned self-proclaimed guardian of open spaces. His foundation bankrolls high-profile conservation groups, his ski resort boasts carbon-neutral certification, and his charitable portfolio gleams with eco-friendly credentials.

But if you scratch the polished surface, Bacon’s empire reveals something far more troubling — a pattern of control, manipulation, and silence that raises unsettling questions about what happens when billionaires plant their flag in environmental politics.

THE GREEN GUARDIAN IN THE WHITE HAT

Bacon’s environmental résumé reads like a publicist’s dream. He’s protected tens of thousands of acres across Colorado, New York, and North Carolina. His Moore Charitable Foundation funds dozens of conservation groups. In 2019, Forbes called him “one of the greatest conservation philanthropists of all time.”

When Bacon bought Taos Ski Valley in 2013, it seemed like another win for environmentalism. He wasn’t just buying a ski resort — he was buying the responsibility to protect the rugged beauty of New Mexico’s Sangre de Cristo Mountains. Under his leadership, Taos became the first ski resort to earn B Corp certification, boasting carbon neutrality and a commitment to sustainability.

That’s the story Bacon tells — the benevolent billionaire saving wild spaces. But that story leaves out some inconvenient details.

THE TAOS LAND GRAB

Bacon’s purchase of Taos Ski Valley didn’t just come with ski lifts and lodges — it came with land, and lots of it. Over the past decade, Taos has shifted from a quirky, rugged ski destination into something more curated — a sleek, modernized resort that caters increasingly to high-end clientele.

Most controversially, Bacon’s plans include a base-to-base gondola, a sprawling project sold as a transportation solution but widely seen as a play to increase property values and usher in luxury development. The U.S. Forest Service greenlit the plan in late 2024, despite fierce local resistance.

The real kicker? Bacon’s refusal to grant a permanent public easement for portions of the historic Williams Lake and Wheeler Peak Trail. Instead, Bacon rerouted the trail through areas he controls, creating a new path that hikers say is poorly suited for winter travel and suspiciously positioned near high-end development zones.

For someone who claims to champion public lands, Bacon’s actions feel less like stewardship and more like gatekeeping — control disguised as conservation.

THE BAHAMAS MONEY TRAIL

If Taos feels like a slow-motion land grab, Bacon’s behavior in the Bahamas is more like a courtroom brawl with a tropical backdrop.

In the mid-2010s, Bacon became embroiled in a vicious feud with his neighbor, Canadian fashion mogul Peter Nygård. The two men — both billionaires with oversized egos — waged war over property disputes, environmental concerns, and eventually a litany of legal battles.

At the heart of it all was Save the Bays, a Bahamian environmental group backed by Bacon. On paper, Save the Bays fought to protect fragile coastal ecosystems. In reality, the group became a pawn in Bacon’s personal war against Nygård.

According to financial records uncovered by Mother Jones, Bacon’s charitable groups funneled $63 million into Waterkeeper Alliance, an environmental organization founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.. From there, the money flowed directly to Save the Bays, which filed multiple lawsuits against Nygård — all while Nygård faced separate accusations of sexual assault and financial crimes.

Save the Bays’ activism may have had legitimate environmental aims, but the sheer size of Bacon’s cash injections — tens of millions of dollars to fund litigation disguised as conservation — turned the organization into something else entirely: a weapon in a billionaire’s personal vendetta.

THE SILENCE OF THE CONSERVATION ELITE

Here’s where things get even messier. Bacon’s name carries so much influence in environmental circles that groups who might otherwise speak out have stayed quiet.

When Bacon pushed forward with his Taos developments, national organizations that should have raised concerns — groups like the Nature Conservancy, Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, and Trout Unlimited — offered no public objection. According to insiders, Bacon’s wealth has turned him into an untouchable figure, a conservationist who funds watchdog groups so effectively that they refuse to bark.

Environmental groups that rely on major donations are caught in a familiar dilemma: criticize the billionaire funder who bankrolls their work, or keep quiet and keep the money flowing. In Bacon’s world, silence is often the path of least resistance.

THE BILLIONAIRE’S BLUEPRINT

Louis Bacon has perfected a dangerous new form of conservation — one where philanthropy becomes leverage, and silence becomes currency. By funding environmental organizations, Bacon has insulated himself from meaningful criticism. By positioning himself as a savior of open spaces, he’s crafted a reputation that shields him from accusations of exploitation.

It’s a brilliant strategy — and a dangerous one.

Because if one man can bankroll environmental groups, steer development policies, and manipulate the conversation about land use — all while claiming the title of “conservationist” — what’s left to stop him from reshaping wild spaces in his own image?

Louis Bacon’s empire is proof that conservation, like politics, is often just a game of power — and right now, Bacon’s playing the board better than anyone else.

The question is: How much more will he take before someone calls checkmate?

---