THEY DIDN’T JUST FIRE HER — THEY SENT ARMED MEN TO HER HOUSE WHILE HER KID WAS HOME ALONE
EDITOR’S NOTE (April 8, 2025): This article was updated after publication to reflect newly confirmed details regarding the Justice Department’s actions. While the original version stated that armed marshals appeared at Elizabeth Oyer’s residence, it has since been clarified that although two special deputy U.S. marshals were dispatched, they did not arrive at her home. The delivery was called off after Oyer acknowledged receipt of the DOJ’s letter via email. The article has been revised accordingly to ensure full factual accuracy while preserving the gravity and implications of the DOJ’s decision to mobilize armed personnel in this context.
You thought it couldn’t get worse after they gave Mel Gibson his guns back.
You thought the story ended with a woman — Elizabeth Oyer — being fired from the Justice Department for doing the right thing: saying no to restoring gun rights for a violent abuser who threatened to kill his ex while she held their infant daughter.
But it didn’t end there.
The Justice Department mobilized armed officers to deliver a warning to her home.
Two special deputy U.S. marshals, authorized to carry firearms, were dispatched to hand-deliver a letter reminding Oyer of her obligation not to share information protected by executive privilege. The letter wasn’t some routine memo — it was timed just days before her voluntary appearance at a public congressional event focused on political retaliation within the DOJ.
The only reason they didn’t show up at her door?
She acknowledged receipt of the letter by email first.
That’s it. That’s the whole difference between a teenage child opening the door to find two armed men — and them not.
THIS IS THE PLAYBOOK OF A REGIME, NOT A REPUBLIC
Let’s drop the euphemisms. This wasn’t “standard protocol.” This wasn’t a bureaucratic error. This was a premeditated escalation — an unnecessary show of force planned against a woman who had already lost her job for telling the truth.
Elizabeth Oyer evaluated Mel Gibson’s petition to have his gun rights restored. She looked at the audio tapes. She saw the broken teeth. She saw the headlines. She said no.
So they fired her.
And then, just before she was set to testify about the political pressure inside Trump’s Justice Department, they mobilized armed officers to deliver a letter that could have — and eventually was — sent via email.
Not a threat. Not quite.
Just enough to make sure she felt one.
TODD BLANCHE, PAM BONDI, AND THE PEOPLE WHO MADE THIS HAPPEN
The marshals were deployed at the direction of the DOJ’s Security and Emergency Planning Staff, operating under the office of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche — the same man whose name appears on the warning letter Oyer received.
And of course, there’s Pam Bondi — the Attorney General who restored Mel Gibson’s gun rights in the first place. The woman who saw the tapes, saw the violence, saw the rage — and chose to empower him anyway.
These are the people running the Justice Department now:
The fixer, the enabler, and the man who sends the muscle.
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE ISN’T A SHIELD FOR COWARDICE
The letter Oyer received didn’t say “Keep your mouth shut.” It didn’t need to.
It “reminded” her — in the dry legalese of government intimidation — that she was bound by laws and policies restricting disclosure of privileged or confidential information. It didn’t accuse her of anything. It simply used official security channels to make damn sure she knew they were watching.
The only thing more chilling than what the letter said was how they intended to deliver it.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR SURVIVORS, WHISTLEBLOWERS — AND THE REST OF US
Elizabeth Oyer wasn’t just a career official. She was a firewall — one of the last people in the room who took public safety seriously enough to say “No, this is wrong.” Her punishment was swift. And now her warning shot has been fired, too.
This is what happens when you stand up to power.
This is what happens when you say a woman’s safety matters more than Mel Gibson’s access to firearms.
This is what happens when the truth is inconvenient.
So let’s be absolutely clear:
Mel Gibson got his guns back.
Elizabeth Oyer got fired.
And when she tried to speak out, the Department of Justice prepared to send armed men to her house — until she replied to an email fast enough.
IF THIS DOESN’T SCARE YOU, YOU’RE NOT PAYING ATTENTION
This wasn’t just a bureaucratic overstep. This was a test run. A line in the sand drawn with the quiet hum of boots that almost showed up.
To every survivor, every federal employee, every person sitting in silence wondering if it’s worth the risk to speak out — know this:
They’ll try to scare you. They’ll try to isolate you.
But they’re counting on the rest of us to forget.
We won’t.
And Elizabeth Oyer isn’t alone.
Want journalism that puts names on power and doesn’t flinch? Support Closer to the Edge.
Just a note to that abuser loser Gibson. You were never that good an actor. As a human you suck even more. Stay out of Canada, felon.
That they wanted to intimidate Elizabeth Oyer with armed marshals is horrifying and shameful. However, I've seen reports from the NYTimes -- who said this: "On the same day that the department informed Ms. Oyer of its plans, she also learned that deputy U.S. marshals would be sent to her home to deliver the department’s letter. After Ms. Oyer assured officials that she had received it via email, the delivery was canceled."--and the Guardian, and other outlets, that they called off the "visit." Do you have evidence that they actually went and scared her son? It's super important that we get all the facts straight; what this regime is doing is catastrophic enough that we shouldn't be juicing the facts. Thanks for all you're doing.